Showing posts with label CO2 emissions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CO2 emissions. Show all posts

Saturday, 22 April 2017

Emissions Rise at Ireland's Power Stations Despite €6 Billion Investment in Wind Energy

One of the things consistently pointed out on this blog is that no matter how much wind energy you deploy, you can never shutdown a single power station. Those who advocate for more wind are slowly realizing this as more facts come out. 

Last year (2016), electricity demand in Ireland rose by about 2.3%.  An additional 600MW of wind was added to the system but the capacity factor (a measure of the annual output from wind farms) fell from 33% to 27%. Also during 2016 the limit on the amount of wind allowed into the system at any one time (non synchronous penetration) was raised from 50% to 55% and then at the end of the year to 60%. 

According to reports by the EPA, emissions and fuel consumption increased in eight out of the eleven power stations for which records were available for 2016. 

Six of these power stations were operated by gas, the other three by oil. Poolbeg (gas), Tarbert (oil) and North Wall (gas) power stations had the largest rises in emissions. Aghada (gas) and Tarbert (oil) power stations had the highest emissions since 2011, while Rhode power station (oil) had the highest since 2007.




Power station
Emissions Increase 2016 Vs 2015
Highest Emissions Since
Fuel Type
Aghada
72%
2011
Gas
Huntstown 2
19%
2013
Gas
Poolbeg
366%
2014
Gas
North Wall
249%
2013
Gas
Great Island
61%
Commissioned in 2015
Gas
Tynagh
70%
2014
Gas
Tawnaghmore
14%
2010
Light Fuel Oil
Tarbert
240%
2011
Heavy Fuel Oil / Light Fuel Oil
Rhode
93%
2007
Light Fuel Oil

Note the three oil run power stations at the bottom all had the highest emissions for many years.

Factors that lead to these increases were :

• The interconnector to the UK was out for four months at the end of 2016. This would partly explain the increases in Dublin power stations such as Poolbeg and North Wall.

• Electricity demand increasing by 2.3%. With new data centres on the way, demand will soon increase by much more than that. 

• Capacity Factor of wind dropping from 33% to 27%. It's an unfortunate fact that no matter how many wind farms there are, if there is no wind, you get no energy. Storage wont fix this problem either as the original energy source is still intermittent wind energy that can remain flat for months on end during periods of high pressure.

• The low price of oil and gas. 

• The low capacity credit of wind energy. Ireland now has 3,000MW of wind, but all these wind turbines cannot replace a single power station. All the power stations must remain on standby. An additional 600MW of wind was added in 2016, roughly a 25% increase on 2015. The only solution for this is nuclear. A nuclear power station can fully replace an existing power station and hence achieves much greater and much more consistent fuel and emissions savings in the long run than wind ever can.

How ironic that Ireland is now dependent on oil again for it's electricity needs after spending close to €6 billion on wind technology and another billion or two on grid upgrades to accommodate this wind. If this is not an indictment of the wind program, then I don't know what is.

Sources :

1) EPA Environmental Reports

http://www.epa.ie/terminalfour/ippc/index.jsp

2) Eirgrid Renewable Energy Curtailment Report 2016

http://www.eirgridgroup.com/site-files/library/EirGrid/Annual-Renewable-Constraint-and-Curtailment-Report-2016-v1.0.pdf

3) Cost of wind is estimated to be €2 million per MW installed.  




Friday, 14 April 2017

Ireland will fail to meet Greenhouse Gas Targets - EPA

by Owen Martin

The EPA have announced that Ireland will miss it's EU Greenhouse Gas emission targets for 2020 because of a growing economy and increases in agriculture and transport activities. The media are warning of EU fines.

Firstly, the EU is in no position to enforce fines for failing to meet emissions or renewable targets. The UNECE Aarhus Compliance Committee have repeatedly issued rulings stating that the EU are in breach of the Aarhus Convention in relation to Ireland's renewable energy plans. So unless Ireland decides to simply lie down in the face of bullying European Union bureaucrats, there will be no fines. 

Secondly, consecutive EU policies have resulted in increased greenhouse gas emissions. By allowing beef imports from countries like Brazil into the EU, shipping and transport emissions will have increased. As Marine Le Pen has pointed out, if you want sustainable agriculture, then grow your own crops and invest in your own farms. The last thing that should be done is to ship beef into your country from 5,000 miles away. 

Another EU policy is that member states should accept millions of refugees. This will increase demand on food, electricity, housing and other resources increasing emissions. 

EU energy policies have increased electricity prices and driven energy intensive industries outside of the EU effectively outsourcing emissions elsewhere on the (same) planet. 

To whom do these policies benefit ? To whom would a fine against Ireland benefit ? It is exactly because of the contradictions inherent in EU policy right now that it is becoming ever more unpopular.



Wednesday, 29 March 2017

The Impact of High Levels of Wind Energy on Conventional Plant

On Wednesday 25th January 2017 wind energy reached a new record of 2,400MW for the Republic of Ireland. This post will look at the impacts on some of the other generation sources.


CCGT ( Gas)




Only three out of eight CCGT ran during the day - two in Dublin (Poolbeg and Dublin Bay) and one in Cork (Whitegate). Presumably, the other 5 plants were paid capacity or constraint payments to shut down for the day.

Wind generation was unusually stable during the day and so Dublin Bay and Whitegate mostly followed demand while the output from Poolbeg had a flat profile. Dublin Bay ran the most efficiently. Whitegate's output hovered between 45% and 60% of it's maximum (or rated capacity otherwise known as load). Poolbeg, on the other hand, operated at about a quarter of it's rated capacity. Operating a CCGT at this level leads to higher specific emissions and fuel consumption, something like driving your car in second gear all the time. 

It would have been therefore preferable to have operated Whitegate on higher loads and take Poolbeg off the grid altogether. The requirement for two power stations to be on load at all times in the Dublin area probably lead to this less than ideal situation.


Coal 




Two out of the the three generators at Moneypoint operated for the day and like the CCGT mostly followed demand.   They operated at an average of 50% of maximum output with minimum output at 40%. A load of 40% capacity is likewise not exactly ideal in terms of efficiency. 


Peat





The three peat power stations are being run on baseload and as a result are not affected by high wind levels. The biomass component seemed to be out of action. The question arises as to why (like wind) peat still receives a subsidy if it is always allowed to operate in the electricity generation market (Though I think the peat subsidy is being phased out). 


OCGT (Gas)




Both open gas cycle units at Sealrock operated at close to full output for the day as like wind they have priority dispatch in the system.


Demand Side Units (DSU)




One relatively new problem for Eirgrid is that despite having all this additional generating capacity in place, matching supply with demand is not as straightforward as previously thanks to the presence of stochastic wind energy. Fast acting plant is one answer to this. Another solution is reducing demand during periods of high demand. Demand side units reduce the demand during peak times giving industrial users a choice to shut down production or use their own diesel generators. 

As more wind is added, more reliance will be placed on DSUs and ironically diesel generation. During this day, on average 18MW per hour of DSU was called on to help keep the lights on. Not a significant amount at this stage. But according to Eirgrid :


The capacity of Demand Side Units in Ireland has increased to 230 MW, and is set to increase further. 


East West Interconnector to UK (EWIC)

The UK interconnector played a crucial role on this day. For most of the time, Ireland sent across it's surplus wind but for an hour, between 6pm and 7pm, Irish generation was insufficient to meet the rise in demand as people arrived home from work and turned their kettles and cookers on. It's an unfortunate fact that you can't "switch the wind on". Also you can't simply switch a large power station like a CCGT on. 

The preferred solution by Eirgrid, presumably because it was cheaper than the other option discussed below, was to reverse the direction of electricity in the interconnector. However, the UK was strapped for generation at this time and (incredibly) France were reliant on UK imports. A precarious situation for the UK but 120MW of spare power for Ireland is not a significant amount for a system of their size.




There is still a shortfall of about 200MW at peak time (where blue line is higher than orange line in the second graph above) which I'm not sure how they made up. Possibly more hydro or DSU or some other peaking plant that I may have missed.

The other option available to Eirgrid would have been to simply increase output from Poolbeg as the demand began to rise. After all, it was being operated at well below optimum efficiency as discussed above.  This is presumably what would have happened if there was no interconnector. Usually the low cost of power purchased from UK would make importing a cheaper option but I can't imagine a grid with such a tight capacity margin as the UK's giving away low cost power during peak demand times. But I can only assume it was somehow cheaper in this case.


The power UK sent to Ireland was made up mainly of gas and coal generation with some nuclear and wind : 




The generation mix for the day is given below  :




Thursday, 29 December 2016

Cash For Ash - How Green Feel Good Polices Damage the Environment

        The remedy is sometimes worse than the disease - Francis Bacon

Josh cartoons


Green polices are mostly ideological and rarely based on any kind of robust analysis. This was never more evident in the Cash for Ash scheme that was setup in Northern Ireland where amazingly, farmers got paid a profit to burn wood pellets. There are reports that farmers with empty sheds could qualify for the handsome subsidies. There are also reports that people are burning the wood pellets right around the clock with windows and doors open to allow the heat out.   The impact on the environment of course is entirely negative. 

A full report on this crazy scheme can be found here in The Irish Times.

Saturday, 10 December 2016

Factcheck Energy Minister

Richard Boyd Barrett, one of the most capable politicians in the country, gave Energy Minister Denis Naughten a grilling in the Dail on Tuesday over his energy plans.  Barrett claimed that wind energy gets 80% of the PSO. The Minister disagreed but didnt have the figures to hand.






FACTCHECK : Wind gets about 67% of the PSO, peat gets 29% with the remaining 4% going to other renewables*.  











FACTCHECK : There is a legal process for assessing plans and programmes. It is not up to Deputy Dooley or Naughten to decide what route we should go down. A Cost Benefit Analysis needs to underpin this type of decision making where billions are at stake, not what Deputy Dooley happens to think is a good idea.





FACTCHECK : It is true that the wind energy guidelines are subject to strategic environmental assessment (SEA). However, an SEA is required for all public plans and programmes. The Government's Renewable Energy Plan (NREAP) has never been subject to an SEA. 


FACTCHECK : The 3-4% savings figure from wind is an overall emissions figure that includes other sectors like transport, heating and agriculture. Last year, there was a 4.9% increase in energy use. Transport's share of overall energy use rose from 33% to 42% in 2015.  So the savings made from installing wind farms are being more than wiped out by rises in other sectors. Yet the political and (Fake) News narrative is still all about electricity generation. 



*I have taken out the clawbacks from security of supply (gas) as they distort the PSO figure. Biomas, biogas and hydro made up about 5% of electricity generation in 2015 according to SEAI.   This means that wind received € 286 million from PSO.  







Thursday, 24 November 2016

Trinity College Lecture on Climate Change by Professor Tim Palmer

by OWEN MARTIN

So tonight there was a presentation in Trinity College by Tim Palmer of Oxford University. First, the good parts - he tried to show both sides of view and addressed some of the claims made by climate "skeptics".  On the bad side, as usual with these events, there was very little time for questions at the end.  Here is just some bullet points and notes I made on the lecture :

•  He gave a counter argument to some of the claims made by Matt Ridley in his October lecture to GWPF. However, no mention of greening i.e the increased plant growth observed around the planet. This to me was Ridley's ace card so I was surprised that he didn't take that on (or maybe not surprised).

•  He explained quite well how using data over short timescales can be misleading. I agree with this however his own temperature graph (from NASA) started in the late 1800s. This is an extremely short time range to be basing any theory on. We didn't have weather stations before 1850 but we know (thanks to geologists) about the Little Ice Age. The Little Ice Age ended around 1850 when CO2 emissions were a tiny fraction of what they are now. We started coming out of the LIA around 1720. This data should be factored in to put climate change in perspective. 

• He explained how the climate system is complex, again I agree, and that it is a chaotic system. When you introduce man made CO2, the system tends to become less chaotic and you end up with warming.  So if you start with this theory, which looks plausible, then you need to fit the facts into this theory. This happens with NASA graphs which are based on adjusted data. You need to take the cooling in the 70s out and you need to reduce the warming in the 40s. You also need to ignore the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (and PDO) which has a well established positive / negative cycle. This question was posed at the end but I cant even remember the answer. Again, these issues need to be addressed but were not considered as the original "greenhouse gas" theory was infallible.

• Palmer explained the clouds issue really well - we don't know whether they lead to cooling or warming.

• No mention was made of solar irradiance. Again, there was a question on this but an all too brief answer.

• If global warming is dangerous to humans today then in a period of natural cooling, global warming would be advantageous to humans (as it would reduce cooling).  Like greening, the upsides were not considered.

• A question was asked at the end asking for evidence that CO2 remains in the atmosphere for 50 years or more. Palmer didn't have any evidence for that claim yet the claim was made as if it were fact. 


Thursday, 22 September 2016

Rise in Ireland's Electricity Generation CO2 Emissions


SEAI have published the latest details on CO2 emissions in Ireland. Electricity generation emissions have risen in 2015 because of a rise in coal consumed in Moneypoint.




The graph is slightly misleading for a couple of reasons. It uses a simplified modelling system that doesn't take full account of increased cycling and ramping from back up generators. Hence the disclaimer on Page 26 :


There are clear limitations in this analysis but it does provide useful indicative results. 

The cycling effects are certainly not small as stated on Page 21 - see here for an analysis

http://euanmearns.com/co2-emissions-variations-in-ccgts-used-to-balance-wind-in-ireland/


In reality, the cycling effects increase as more wind is added so the CO2 per kWh of electricity may be fairly accurate back in say 2010 but starts getting progressively worse by 2015. 

The other problem is that by the end of 2012, the East West Interconnector was up and running sending Co2 free power to Ireland throughout 2013 and after that. This is because emissions are counted in the country of origin, in this case the UK. No account seems to be taken in the graph above of this. There is no Imports (avoided) in the legend.

Lastly, as stated recently on this blog, use of diesel generators is becoming more common with increased intermittent wind power, and is now at about 230MW capacity. I can't find any reference to them in the SEAI paper so presumably they are not included. 

Monday, 12 September 2016

Over 40% of Wind Energy Shutdown Last Night

by OWEN MARTIN

Last night, over 40% of wind energy produced was shutdown or curtailed during a spell of gale force winds across the island of Ireland. This episode clearly shows the limitations of relying too much on an intermittent source of energy like wind. Billions of euros worth of turbine installations become worthless at both low wind and at high wind.   

Figure 1


The reason for the shutdown of so many wind turbines can be clearly seen in the System Frequency charts before and after the wind shutdown. 

As the gales gathered in strength on Sunday evening, maintaining the frequency of the grid became more difficult :


Figure 2


The zig zag patterns in the Figure 2 show how frequency fluctuated between 49.9 and 50.1 Hz. The dips represent periods of too much wind when system inertia drops (due to lack of conventional generation such as coal or gas). Should frequency drop below 49.7 Hz then a blackout may occur, so Eirgrid rectified this by shutting down some of the wind and allowing more conventional generation into the system. The frequency then rises again to 50Hz. Gas turbines are forced to ramp up and down more often to maintain system stability during such periods thus pushing emissions up and negating some of the benefits of  having all the wind in the first place. 



Figure 3

Figure 3 shows what happened when over 40% of the wind output was shutdown and there was more manageable levels of wind, in this case about 1,500MW. The frequency is very stable and there is little risk of blackouts. This has been normality in the grid for many years. Compare it with Figure 2. This is the future. It will certainly test engineering skills to it's limits. Gas turbines will have to function under greater strain than before. It will cost a lot of money. There can no longer be a guarantee that the electric kettle will boil when you want it to. 

The other option Eirgrid have to maintain a stable frequency in these situations is to cut demand - which is in effect a blackout under another name. The future is renewable. The future is green. I'm at a loss to figure out how this is "progress".

Thursday, 16 June 2016

Rising Costs of Stabilizing Irish Grid

Synchronous Condenser in Australia (Wikipedia)

As levels of wind energy increase, fossil fuel generators and other devices are been called on to provide stability services to the Irish grid to help prevent blackouts. Its a simple engineering fact that as wind energy increases, the grid loses inertia and the frequency of electricity sent to your home becomes more difficult to control. The frequency of the Irish grid is set at approximately 50 Hertz, give or take about 1 Hertz, and all our appliances will not run outside this small range. 

Large power stations have trip switches that deactivate generators when the frequency moves outside this range so if the grid loses inertia for even a few seconds, there will be a cascade effect as generators drop out. A widescale blackout is the likely result. The rotational speed of wind farms is changing all the time and at different regions and it's because of this that they can't provide inertia to the grid. Gas and coal power stations are classed as synchronous generators because they provide stability to the grid, while wind farms and the East West interconnector are deemed non synchronous generators (SNSP). 

At the moment non synchronous generators are limited to 50-55% penetration in the grid. It is envisaged that this will have to rise to 75% in order to achieve the 20-20 targets. A consequence of this will be less synchronous generators online during high wind periods and increased risk of blackouts. So synchronous generators need to be paid more to maintain stability through what are called ancillary services.     


The diagram below shows that these ancillary or grid stability payments increased from € 24.5 million to € 26 million in the year to April 2016. 





POR means Primary Operating Reserves and SOR Secondary Operating Reserves. POR can step in up to 5 seconds and SOR up to 15 seconds to replace a generator that suddenly drops out. Tertiary Reserves (TOR1 and TOR2) take longer to start but can be maintained for longer time. These reserves are set by the single largest generator that happens to be online at the time, usually the East West Interconnector. However, demand for fast reserves, which are inefficient and high emitters, is increasing with higher levels of wind as wind fluctuations dominate the grid

The largest increase was for Reactive Power services. These are mostly provided by synchronous condensers which are able to provide stability in times of large voltage changes due to stochastic wind energy. Engineers at UCD provide a good overview of these devices here.  







Like battery storage units, synchronous condensers are net consumers of electricity but are essential for keeping the lights on with high levels of non-synchronous wind energy.  Adding units that consume more energy over their lifetime that they can generate is a consequence of the wind program and should have been included in a cost benefit analysis, which as we know, was never done.





Wednesday, 25 May 2016

Sales of Diesel Generators expected to rise in Western Europe


It's an inconvenient fact that the more intermittent renewables you install, the more fast acting generators, like diesel generators, you need to keep the lights on. The rush for green energy will have lots of unintended consequences like this.


  • Global annual diesel genset capacity additions are expected to increase from 62.5 GW in 2015 to 103.7 GW in 2024, representing a 5.8% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). Meanwhile, global revenue from the installation of diesel gensets is expected to grow from $41.6 billion in 2015 to $67.9 billion in 2024. Asia Pacific is forecast to be the largest market for diesel gensets, followed by Western Europe and then North America. Leading countries for diesel genset installations include the United States, China, and India, among others. 



Sunday, 1 May 2016

A Brief History of Climate Change in Ireland

by Owen Martin

Scientists generally have little historical sense; Thus it happens that many ideas at different times are repeatedly conceived anew, without the initiator knowing that these subjects had been considered already before. According to their natural mentality, some researchers live so much in the present that they are inclined to think of every idea that occurs to them, or their group, as newAlbert Einstein, 1954



Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation with historic climate events



During the past two centuries or so, Ireland has had a cyclical temperature record with periods of both warming and cooling. Before that, there was the Little Ice Age and before that the Medieval Warming Period that allowed monks live on Skellig Michael Island.

Ireland's folklore is full of references to extreme snow and frost events.  In the 7th Century, it was believed that the sea between Ireland and Scotland froze over and people from both countries paid each other visits across the ice. If it did occur, it did so during the beginning of the Medieval warming period. More recently, during the Little Ice Age in 1784, there were reports of snow around Belfast 15 to 20 feet deep. In 1814, snow lay in Dublin streets 5 feet thick. In 1837, the village of Lewes in South East England was destroyed by a snow avalanche. Severe snowstorms hit Dublin in both 1845 and 1850 with the River Liffey reportedly freezing over in the former year. These two cold periods would have occurred during the Irish Famine which was caused by the spread of the potato disease blight. Severe frost would have exacerbated the destruction of the potato.

These events (since 1784) occurred during what became known as "The Little Ice Age". Temperature records from Armagh go as far back as 1800 and seem to support these events. So what of the long term trends ? Well, as we shall see things remained very cold in Ireland until the end of the 19th century.

If we look at two of the oldest temperature records from Ireland - Phoenix Park in Dublin and Valentia in Kerry - we see two similar but slightly different trends :



We can see that Phoenix Park (Dublin) has an upward heating trend overall. Possibly, and most likely, this is due to the urban heating effect as the city increased in size. By contrast, Valentia had no overall warming trend. There was warming until 1900, then cooling till 1920, then warming till 1950, then cooling till 1985 and warming again thereafter. At present, we've arrived back at 1940's temperatures whilst the 1980's had colder temperatures than anytime previous in the record. Valentia gives more accurate readings than Phoenix Park because of the simple fact that it lies way out on the South Western Coast away from urban areas.



Valentia records begin in the cold 1870s and 80s. In 1879, the Thames froze over three feet thick in some places. People freezing to death was not uncommon throughout Northern Europe. 1881 was a very cold year by all accounts, with rivers freezing over in Ireland :

1881


Then in the 1890's, things began to warm up. By 1899, people had recognized the unusual warm climate that was occurring :

1899

In July and August 1900, average temperatures ranged between 21 and 23 degrees Celsius - higher than the previous two summers of 2014 and 2015. "Brilliant bursts of sunshine alternated with drenching downpours of rain" it was reported at the time. This weather created very favourable conditions for potato blight and almost all areas of the country were affected by the fungus. 

Then, things started to cool once again, peaking in 1918 or 1919. In 1908, the Thames froze over (as recalled by George Orwell in Coming Up For Air).

1908


1917 was remembered as the year of the snow with snowfalls in January and a severe snowstorm on April fools day, the worst for 50 years with snow depths reported of 18 inches deep. Valentia records indeed record 1917 as the worst on record at that stage but three years post 1960 were just as cold.

1919 was described as a sunless year. July, normally the hottest month of the year, was remarkably cold :

1919




Man made CO2 emissions during this period were increasing as the Industrial Revolution progressed. However, in the timeframe we have looked at so far, we have had a period of warming (up to 1900) and then a period of cooling (up to 1919). So there must be natural forces at work. What part CO2 emissions had to play is therefore very hard to say but it would appear the answer is very little, if at all. 

Man made CO2 emissions begin to rise to levels higher than before post - 1919 with drops in 1929 when the worldwide recession kicks in and in 1940 during World War 2. Temperatures start to rise once again in this period, peaking around 1949 with temperatures that would not occur again until 1997 (an El Nino year). The interesting thing is that the most intensive CO2 activity, coal production, reduced drastically in the UK and America during the war years 1939 - 1945. 



But temperatures continued rising and peaked just after coal production sky rocketed after the war. 




In 1945, there are reports of Russian farmers working in the Arctic Circle as the ice begins to melt. Droughts occur in Ireland in the latter part of the 1940s. Because most of the electricity in Ireland was powered by hydro, electricity rationing is commonplace. A good reminder of what electricity is like when it is powered by mostly renewables and is at the mercy of the elements. An interesting cold blip occurred during January to March in 1947 which was the most severe cold spell of the century so far. Remarkably, temperatures did not rise above 5C during this period. Valentia records show this cold spell between two very large spikes. However, the general temperature trend was continued warming. In 1949, temperatures peaked and the country was hit by a heatwave. Temperatures hit 85 F in Tipperary on June 23rd - or 29 degrees Celsius. The highest temperature at the same station during the 2006 European heat wave was also 29 degrees


1949
  


 In the same year, we find the first mention of something strange happening to the climate in the media. Reports about glaciers melting everywhere are what we are used to hearing today.  Geoffrey Hattersley Smith, the famous glaciologist is mentioned. Geoffrey died in 2012 and in his obituary he was described as been "careful about committing himself on paper" about global warming. This is probably not a surprise as he saw global warming happening before and the subsequent cooling.



1949




So were we living in the last phase of the Ice Age ? Well as we shall see, the answer is no. Temperatures began to drop in 1950. In 1953 and 54, climate scientists and researchers were still talking about the global warming. In 1953, we find the first mention of "climate change". Mr E.V. Lane was a lecturer in Trinity College at the time and appeared on Radio to explain what had been happening to the climate. The resulting Irish Times article deserves a full blog article in its own right but suffice to say its interesting because both the advantages (increased farmland and harvest) and disadvantages (rising seas) of a warming world are given.  Mr Lane mentions Iceland as a country benefiting from warming with increased barley harvest but this was only to last for another few years as  "Frost having frequently damaged hayfields in many parts of Iceland, especially during the cold period in the 1960s-80s, reducing the potential hay production by 20-30% when it happened."   One can see here how Iceland has since benefited from increasing temperatures once again.

In 1954, we get the very first reference to greenhouse gases and man made climate change in an article written by Dr Gerald Wendt (click on pics to expand) : 


                                     
                                 
                           



One of the most interesting claims that Dr. Wendt makes is that CO2 emissions had risen by 10% since 1900 and that this was sufficient to account for the 1 degree increase in global temperature. But CO2 emissions have risen exponentially since then so do we see a corresponding rise in temperatures ? Well, we now know that there is not a linear relationship between CO2 and temperature and that in fact there is a saturation point after which increasing levels of CO2 has but negligible impact on temperature. So we should begin to see a further rise in temperature in the second half of the 20th century, but progressively less so (if his theory is right). Also of note, is his final paragraph where he illustrates the advantages of a warmer world - higher farm yields and the large areas of land that will be available for food production.

However, Dr Wendt would have lost money in the bookies. Nature does not play by man's rules. By the early 1950s, the temperature began to drop, not just in Ireland, but everywhere. By the middle of the 1970s, it was as cold as the pre-1920s and got even colder towards the end of the decade. January and February of 1963 saw the coldest spell on record in Ireland and in England since 1740. The Beatles famously toured in a van up and down England that winter, lying on top of each other to keep warm.


From Met Eireann


The demise of grouse was partly blamed on climate change :


1975 Article


A drought occurred in Ireland during October 1974 to August 1976, the worst in some places for 150 years (1976 was the hottest (bucking the trend) and driest summer around Europe for many years). However, a few years later, the highest ever rainfall over a two day period was recorded at Valentia, in November 1980. According to Met Eireann, severe storms were not uncommon. All proving that extreme climatic events do not just occur during warm periods.

By 1978, the idea of global cooling was accepted nearly everywhere. I've written previously about this here. Irish observatories were showing very cold conditions :


1978
ESB could not cope with the increased electricity demand and power cuts were commonplace during 1978 as demand for electric heaters went up. The harsh winter of 1978/9 claimed 88 lives around Europe (full article at end). Out of a sample of 28, 82% of climate scientists agreed that the world was getting colder :

1977

The same article claims that the Northern hemisphere cooled by 3F since the mid 1940s, roughly equivalent to a drop of 1.5C. 



The Valentia temperature record backs up the idea that the world was cooling at the time. It would be interesting to find out what impact this had on culture at the time but I dont have enough space to do that here. But here is a taster. The music scene in Manchester in early 1980 sounded like this :



Joy Division sounded like Manchester: cold, sparse and at times bleak - Bernard Sumner, musician in Joy Division

One could argue that CO2 emissions decreased during the two oil crises of the 1970s. The problem is that all graphs for historical CO2 emissions show continued rising of CO2 emissions during this period and the second half of the 20th century, as coal use (especially in China) goes through the roof. So what was causing the cooling that everyone experienced ? 

What happens after this is that once again, the climate experts were proved wrong. Ireland (and the world) begins to warm up (again) in about 1986 till the present day, with a huge dip in 2010. It is during this period that the "Global Warming" and then post 2010 "Climate Change" movement takes hold on man's natural tendency towards hysteria. That is not to say that CO2 does not have an impact on climate, but when one examines climate history, it becomes harder and harder to claim that it is the main driver.  I believe it is thermal dynamics in ocean currents that is the main driver, which may well be driven by a number of different factors such as changes in solar activity. Compare the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) with the Valentia temperature record. A high correlation can be seen :


Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation 1880 - 2010



Conclusion 


Contemporary scientists claimed that there was warming of 1C between 1850 -1950, then cooling of 1.5C between 1950-1977. As you can see from above, Valentia pretty much backs this up. Then warming again of over 1C, bringing us back to 1950 levels. The temperature data that is released today to back up global warming claims steady and gradual warming during the same period and no cooling (or in some cases just reduced warming). So were their contemporary climate scientist colleagues wrong ?  Well, the Valentia record backs them up.

Based on the above past records, the most likely direction for temperature now is towards cooling, rather than warming.  Recent Sea Surface Temperatures in the Atlantic support this:



The cycle continues. So would you rather live in a warmer or colder world ? Which poses the greatest threat ? Personally, I would have to agree with the climate scientists of the 1970s :


1977






1979