Saturday 23 March 2019

Wind Industry Admits Wind Energy Costs Money

But claim only as little as €1 per person


A recent Irish Wind Energy Association report has stated that the total net cost of wind energy to the consumer has been one euro per person per year since 2000. It is an interesting report for a number of reasons, not least, that this is the first time the wind industry in Ireland have admitted that wind energy costs money. 

The total cost calculated was €0.1bn, but this includes savings from not having to pay EU fines of € 0.7bn. Since it now looks like we will miss our targets regardless of how much more Ireland invests in wind (and unlikely in any event that the EU will impose fines on Member States), the actual cost then of wind energy according to the report was €0.8bn , eight times the cost claimed.  

Their calculations were based on wholesale price and capacity payments savings of €2.5bn  on one side and costs of €3.3bn on the other side arising from the PSO Levy, DS3, grid investment and constraint costs. This is the first time that the wind industry have acknowledged that these last three costs are directly related to increased levels of wind. This blog has argued that they should be included as wind related costs for many years now. 

I have shown before that the link between higher levels of wind and lower wholesale prices is tenuous. Wholesale prices are actually rising as investment in wind is at it's peak. The wind industry report used models to calculate their wholesale price savings rather than real data. I can no longer find any real time pricing data on the new SEMO website.  But if it is really the case that wind has led to €2.3bn in wholesale price savings plus €200m in capacity payments savings, then that means that power stations have taken a hit of €2.5bn over the 20 year period, with some additional revenue of €0.5bn from additional constraint payments. So about €2bn in lost revenue, the equivalent of about one whole year of wholesale payments lost to fossil fuel generators.  There is some evidence that has come out in recent days that shows that power stations are now losing money. Last year, ESB were forced to write down the value of two of their power stations. 

Finally, the report admits what I've been writing about for years, that only 10-11% of wind energy can be relied on as equivalent conventional capacity (capacity credit) :


The rate at which wind capacity reduces the capacity requirement is defined by the wind capacity credit, which is around 11% of installed wind capacity.

Under the I-SEM capacity market rules, wind receives a capacity credit of about 10% and OCGTs a capacity credit of about 92%. This means that 1 GW of wind is replaced by 109 MW (= 1 GW * (10% / 92%) of OCGTs.

The Wind Aware Ireland report goes into detail on the various wind related costs (they calculated a cost of € 1.2bn per year). I do not want to rehash all of those points, for those interested you can read the report here. But for further proof that costs across the board are increasing every year as more wind is added, one need look no further than the recent Ancillary Systems Services Report released by Eirgrid. When compared with the same report from three years ago, the costs to maintain back up reserves has more than doubled :






The full IWEA report can be read here.

10 comments:

  1. Carmel McCormack24 March 2019 at 00:20

    And what are the costs to import via the interconnectors the so called 'zero carbon emission electricity' from the UK into Ireland? How much of the renewable electricity target includes such 'zero carbon emissions' from U.K. fossil fuel generated electricity? Is it all some form of hocus pocus voodoo carbon emissions accounting in order to massage the actual national carbon emission statistics?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The entire wind energy programme has been based on criminal illegality and lies. The business model is build, sell on and get out while they can. The big question is where are they getting the money to build more wind farms? The level of debt is astounding. ESB electric Ireland is rising prices by another 4% on April 1st. The economic damage is repairable, the environmental damage is not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. Where is the cycling impact on conventional power plant due to wind variability considered? Even at 2% reduction in efficiency, this would blow a hole in the claimed cost benefits of wind.

    2. This entire report is based on the fallacy that the marginal cost of wind power is zero. It is not. The marginal cost of wind is the REFIT price i.e. about €80/MWhr. This is the price at which each additional unit of wind power will be supplied.

    It is a nonsense to claim that somehow wind clears the market, and then conventional plant comes in to take up the slack. Wind is required to be dispatched first, that is all. If there was a true market at work, wind would often not get a look in, as at present, the market price is around €65/MWhr.

    Of course, the institutional state has made sure that even this analysis is no longer possible, as they no longer provide the current system marginal price of electricity on their public dashboard.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The reduction in value of the power plants is probably more to do with them cycling like crazy to keep up with wind and the resulting higher maintenance costs. Which is making them less profitable .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Profitability is also a function of utilisation. Even though conventional plants receive "capacity payments", which in theory should cover their fixed costs, the reduction in utilisation as wind gets priority results in lower overall profits. This means lower return on capital investment. Hence lower asset values, and potentially, exit from a market even though generation costs themselves may not be inefficient.

      Delete
  5. More and more we are seeing propaganda masquerading as sophisticated analysis.

    This report claims that wind is responsible for the elimination of higher cost conventional plant from the electricity supply market, thereby providing big savings. If this is the case why are these savings not being seen by the consumer? EU countries such as Ireland which have high levels of wind penetration just happen to also have some of the highest electricity prices.

    Where is the analysis that considers what would have happened such inefficient plant anyway in an efficient market? Would they not have been replaced anyway with more efficient new entrants? Isn’t that what this market theory is all about?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The cost:

    Without wind: 6,300 MW of conventional power plant and a little river hydro. Making 100% of requirements at a cost of 100%.

    With wind: 6,300 MW of conventional plant. (including 300 river hydro).

    4,000 MW of wind

    3,000 MW of fast acting back up plant.

    Total 13,300 = 210% of normal cost. So an annual bill of 1,200 Euros will be 2,520 Euros and that does not include the infrastructure cost.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Carmel McCormack27 March 2019 at 23:31

    Add the cost of importing electricity via the interconnectors and the cost of those interconnectors. Plus the cost of supporting DS3 projects such as the 3500MW+ of proposed Lithium Ion Battery Energy Storage Systems and banks of new diesel/dual fuel diesel generators. Plus around 1200MW of fossil fuel guzzling Data Centres by 2023 and the proposed €1Bn Celtic interconnector and new fossil fuel power plants required to power them. https://dbei.gov.ie/en/Publications/Publication-files/Government-Statement-Data-Centres-Enterprise-Strategy.pdf
    Battery Storage will also cause carbon emissions to increase due to the loss of energy in the electricity to chemical and back to electricity conversion process. Electric vehicles powered via battery storage that stores electricity from the electricity grid that has been generated predominantly from fossil fuels in Ireland is likely to make electric vehicles less energy efficient than petrol and diesel cars and therefore will increase carbon emissions. The amount of installed megawatt capacity and the costs of same are set to soar! That estimate given above of €2500 is likely to end up closer to €5000 per annum in reality! ESB said recently that the equivalent of 14 million Tesla power walls would be required to be installed in order to provide at best one days supply of emergency electricity storage. That's about up to 7 powerwalls per household. 7 Tesla PowerWalls that may have to be replaced every 5yrs would cost every household about €10,000 per annum! Val your cost estimate is far too conservative!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carmel McCormack30 March 2019 at 15:40

      New Eirgrid CEO says electricity demand will grow by 40% in next 5-7yrs!

      'The shift to renewables and the emergence of power-hungry data centres mean Ireland's power infrastructure will need substantial upgrades in the years ahead.'

      "Putting in new transmission lines is clearly an option of last resort but with 40pc growth in electricity demand in front of us in the next five to seven years, and then the need to decarbonise the system, more transmission infrastructure will be needed. It would be wrong of me not to say that," Mr Foley said.

      https://m.independent.ie/business/irish/new-power-lines-unavoidable-says-eirgrid-chief-37907948.html

      Delete
  8. Watch how the artificial carbon taxes are used to hike the cost of non-renewables energy, and to provide a justification for wind subsidies. At the moment carbon tax accounts for something like 5-6 euro of the wholesale cost of gas powered electricity. As you increase this cost, you reduce the cost disadvantage of wind. You also hide the subsidies to wind in tax, because the Public Service Obligation will reduce as the nominal differential cost to wind reduces.

    ReplyDelete